Abstract
This paper is a response to James Anquandah’s call to make archaeological praxis relevant to national development agendas and to public and local communities. More specifically, it addresses how archaeology can contribute toward the advancement of community needs and interests, integrate the politics of recognition and inclusion, and also take into account community heritage values that necessitate active engagement with the past, particularly in regard to archaeological work at Christiansborg Castle in Osu, Accra, Ghana.
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
Purchase access
You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
In this issue
Jump to section
- Article
- Abstract
- Introduction
- A Very Brief History of Christiansborg Castle and the Danish Transatlantic Slave Trade
- The Social and Material Worlds of Danes, Ga, and Danish-Ga In and Around Christiansborg Castle
- Autoarchaeological Interventions
- (Unearthing the) Collective, Collaborative, and Critical
- Archaeological Ethics and the Obligation to Educate
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Footnotes
- References
- Info & Metrics
- References
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.